‘Hawks lost. Time to trade everyone away again.

AUTHOR: | IN: Blackhawks | COMMENTS: 6 Comments |

Holy living hell. Want to know what I hate more than a meathead who gets their panties in a jumble over the goaltending after every loss? A meathead who gets their panties in a jumble over the goaltending after every loss and gets paid for it.

Steve Rosendouche has struck again, telling us all how last night the St. Louis Blues showed us what the Blackhawks need: A “vicious” defenseman and a goalie. I hate this son of a bitch with a passion.

The Blackhawks did not lose last night because of goaltending. The Blackhawks lost because of the biggest problem that faces this team night in and night out: Its propensity to turnover the puck in its own zone countless times. All three goals came off ‘Hawks turnovers in their own end, leaving Cristobal Huet out to dry. There’s a reason Coach Q is sticking with Huet, and it’s because he’s smarter than Rosendouche and all the other meatheads who seemingly refuse to pay attention.

It’s starting to get out of hand that each loss has another person throwing in the proverbial towel, making ridiculous comments about what the Blackhawks need to improve. Could they use some depth on defense? Sure, I wouldn’t mind snagging a vetern to enhance the defense.

If you think the Blackhawks need an enforcer or another goaltender to win the Stanley Cup, start focusing your attention on baseball season and leave us hockey fans alone. The Blackhawks have to improve their gameplay with the current roster that no addition could help.

The Blackhawks don’t plan on changing their top two defensive pairings, nor do they plan on changing the top three lines (not counting the return of Dave Bolland). Those lines and pairings are where the bulk of the turnovers are taking place, in turn leading to goals. Duncan Keith and Andrew Ladd made brutal turnovers which led to Blues goals last night, and Brent Seabrook decided to screen Huet and deflect a goal past his own netminder. Plus, Keith also made a horrible turnover at the end of the first period which led to a breakaway.

So, your top two defensemen and quality forward made a couple of bonehead plays leading to shots only Lady Luck could save. Do a “vicious” defenseman or another goaltender prevent this from happening? No.

It’s just that it’s easier for Rosendouche and the meatheads to bitch about something that requires no thought. It’s easy to blame goaltending. There’s a guy in front of the net, and his job is to stop shots. If he doesn’t stop EVERY  shot, he’s an asshole. That’s easy.

The Blackhawks have fought the least in the NHL this season. Fighting is part of hockey. The Blackhawks need an enforcer. That’s easy.

It’s much more difficult to realize how bad turnovers lead to missed chances and more quality opportunities for the opposition. Right now, that’s the ‘Hawks biggest problem. It’s not a matter of puck control, it’s a matter of controlling the puck at the RIGHT times.

Last night, the Blackhawks didn’t do that. THAT’S why they lost.

Follow BlackhawkUp.com @blackhawksup and on Facebook



Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

If the Blackhawks trade for Turco, I'll light myself on fire.

Chicago can have Turco! haha I think all this Chicago trade talk is funny. They need to get rid of a bit of salary and maybe add another good blue-liner and I think they will be ok.

But most of us in Dallas would like it if the 'hawks wanna give up any sort of talent or prospect for Turco.

Great post. Seems like all this goalie nonsense started when Roenick came out of the woodwork and announced the 'Hawks needed a goalie. If memory serves, they said the same thing about Osgood last year, and the Red Wings sure look like they made out OK.

Jeff Great post. I agree that those turnovers is what cost us that game against the Blues NOT HUET. Patrick Roy couldn't have stopped those including the deflection by Seabs. That Blues game was very winnable in fact we would have won 2-1 if not for the 2 stupid turnovers But I do Think an addition like Niedermayer or even Kaberle (who is on the block according to Yahoo sports) would be great for this team. Our defense alone could win a cup with those pairings...

So Keith, you are saying the turnover problem is moot and the Hawks can't win with Huet. Congrats my friend, you are the new official Blackhawk Up meathead.

You are an idiot!
The only thing wrong with the Hawks is Huet. Until he is gone, their chances of winning the Cup let alone a playoff series are 0!