Chicago Blackhawks Roundtable: John Hayden And Second-Line Centers

By Colin Likas
Mar 18, 2017; Toronto, Ontario, CAN; Chicago Blackhawks center John Hayden (40) during their game against the Toronto Maple Leafs at Air Canada Centre. The Blackhawks beat the Maple Leafs 2-1 in overtime. Mandatory Credit: Tom Szczerbowski-USA TODAY Sports
Mar 18, 2017; Toronto, Ontario, CAN; Chicago Blackhawks center John Hayden (40) during their game against the Toronto Maple Leafs at Air Canada Centre. The Blackhawks beat the Maple Leafs 2-1 in overtime. Mandatory Credit: Tom Szczerbowski-USA TODAY Sports /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
3 of 4
Next
chicago blackhawks
Feb 21, 2017; Saint Paul, MN, USA; Chicago Blackhawks forward Artem Anisimov (15) skates with the puck in the third period against the Minnesota Wild at Xcel Energy Center. The Chicago Blackhawks beat the Minnesota Wild 5-3. Mandatory Credit: Brad Rempel-USA TODAY Sports /

Jeff Franklin

Question 1: If John Hayden sticks around the Blackhawks into the postseason, I’d like him to be on the fourth line. In a perfect world, the ‘Hawks would go into the playoffs completely healthy, and that is certainly a possibility if everyone stays healthy while Artem Anisimov recovers.

I’d prefer the ‘Hawks to go into the playoffs with the same lines that were so dominant in February and early March. Hayden would be an upgrade at wing on the fourth line.

Question 2: Nick Schmaltz has fit like a glove centering the second line since Artem Anisimov went down. His game fits the creativity and speed of Patrick Kane and Artemi Panarin perfectly.

Live Feed

Da Windy City

  • Chicago Blackhawks: DeBrincat and Kane are magical in OT Da Windy City
  • 2 new Chicago Blackhawks players to be thankful for in 2021 Da Windy City
  • Chicago Blackhawks: Calgary was a tough way to end the trip Da Windy City
  • Chicago Blackhawks: 1 player to keep an eye on in Calgary Da Windy City
  • Chicago Blackhawks: Marc-Andre Fleury saves the day in win Da Windy City
  • With that being said, I’m still going to go with No 15 between those guys. That line has been one of the best if not the best line in hockey since it was formed last season. It’s great to have another center like Schmaltz who can step in between them and produce, but I’ll give Anisimov the benefit of the doubt as he has done nothing but produce since he’s been here.

    Gail Kauchak

    Question 1: In his six games played with the Blackhawks, John Hayden has registered at least three or more hits in all of them. In his second game against Toronto, he had seven hits. So we know he can be that physical presence that’s usually associated with third- and fourth-liners.

    He’s also already earned a goal and two assists in his very short time in the NHL. If he can provide that same offensive threat on the fourth line, this could be really dangerous. Put him on the right side where he’s most comfortable, and let him do his stuff.

    Let’s face it; from what he’s shown so far, I think he’s a better option than Dennis Rasmussen, Andrew Desjardins, Jordin Tootoo or Tomas Jurco. And he shows composure and confidence. Give him a shot in the playoffs.

    Question 2: The Ryan Hartman experiment didn’t work out, so I still think Nick Schmaltz is the best bet. As long as he doesn’t have to take many draws. In the last game, both Jonathan Toews and Marcus Kruger were being used for the initial faceoff, and then they would immediately switch for either Schmaltz or Artemi Panarin (whomever of that second line wasn’t already on the ice). It’s not ideal, but hopefully it’s a crutch that will work until Artem Anisimov returns.

    facebooktwitterreddit